Extracorporeal blood oxygenation and ozonation (EBOO): a controlled trial in patients with peripheral artery disease

Di Paolo N, Bocci V, Salvo DP, et al. International Journal of Artificial Organs, 2005.

View the abstract on PubMed

Study type
Randomized controlled trial
People studied
28 people
Population
Patients with peripheral artery disease
Published
2005, International Journal of Artificial Organs
Identifiers
PMID 16288443, DOI 10.1177/039139880502801012
Group
Studies of EBO2 / EBOO given to people

What the authors reported

In 28 patients with peripheral artery disease randomized to EBOO or intravenous prostacyclin, the abstract reports highly significant regression of skin lesions with EBOO, and says pain, pruritus, heavy legs and well-being differed significantly between the two groups; it found no significant change in vascularisation of the lower limbs before and after treatment in either group.

What limits this result

Small sample of 28 patients from a single Italian center; the available abstract does not describe blinding of outcome assessment or the randomization method.

Reports of the procedure as given to patients, and a review of them by its developers. Laboratory and device-development work on the circuit is under background science. One study rarely settles a medical question; our guides weigh each paper against the rest of the evidence.

How the study was done

Design
Randomized controlled clinical trial: 28 patients with PAD randomized to EBOO or intravenous prostacyclin
Setting
Nephrology and Dialysis Department, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
Read from
Read from the abstract only; where this page says nothing about an item, the abstract does not report it. Read on September 28, 2026.

Source: Abstract on PubMed

Study arms

Each group as the paper describes it.
GroupParticipantsWhat they received
EBOONot reportedExtracorporeal blood oxygenation and ozonation (EBOO)
Intravenous prostacyclinNot reportedIntravenous prostacyclin (comparison treatment)

Source: Abstract on PubMed

Procedure as reported

Sessions
210 EBOO treatments (per-patient schedule not stated in the abstract)

In the paper's own units, not converted.

Source: Abstract on PubMed

What it measured

Regression of skin lesions
Highly significant regression with EBOO compared with prostacyclin
Pain, pruritus, heavy legs and well-being
Significantly different between the two groups
Vascularisation of the lower limbs, before and after treatment
No significant differences in either group

Source: Abstract on PubMed

Safety as reported

No side effects or complications were recorded during the 210 EBOO treatments

Source: Abstract on PubMed

Where we cite this study

All studies we track ยท How the studies compare