Effects of ozonated autohemotherapy on the antioxidant capacity of Thoroughbred horses

Tsuzuki N, Endo Y, Kikkawa L, et al. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2016.

View the abstract on PubMed

Study type
Animal study
Animals studied
10 animals
Population
Ten gelding Thoroughbred horses (non-race horses)
Published
2016, Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
Identifiers
PMID 26166812, DOI 10.1292/jvms.15-0225
Group
Background science and mechanism studies

What the authors reported

In 10 non-race Thoroughbred geldings, each used as its own control, ozonated autohemotherapy was followed by a higher biological antioxidant potential at 3 and 7 days and a lower oxidative stress index; the reactive-oxygen-metabolite marker did not differ, and the antioxidant change was no longer measurable at 14 days.

What limits this result

Animal study in ten horses, not humans; each horse served as its own control; measures blood antioxidant markers rather than any disease outcome, and does not test EBO2's continuous-filtration circuit.

How ozone acts on blood and cells, how blood filters work, the laboratory and device-development studies behind the EBOO circuit, and studies that measure markers in the blood rather than how patients fare. None of these shows whether EBO2 helps patients. One study rarely settles a medical question; our guides weigh each paper against the rest of the evidence.

How the study was done

Design
The same horses were used as controls and for treatment
Setting
Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan (author affiliation)
Read from
Read from the full text of the paper. Read on September 28, 2026.

Sources: Full text on PubMed Central, Abstract on PubMed

Study arms

Each group as the paper describes it.
GroupParticipantsWhat they received
Ten gelding Thoroughbred non-race horses10Ozonated autohemotherapy (OAHT); the same horses were used as controls

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Procedure as reported

Ozone concentration
25 µg/mlThe ozone gas was adjusted to make the ozone concentration 25 µ g/m l.
Blood volume
400 ml of blood
Sessions
Conducted on each horse on 8/20/2014
Blood flow
3.2 ml/kg/hr (re-infusion rate)we slowly reinfused the ozonated blood back into the horse (3.2 m l/kg/hr)
Anticoagulant
50 ml of sodium acid citrate (Citramin)50 m l of sodium acid citrate (Citramin, Fuso Pharmaceutical Industries, Osaka, Japan)

In the paper's own units, not converted.

Sources: Full text on Europe PMC, Full text on PubMed Central

What it measured

Biological antioxidant potential (BAP), OAHT versus control
Higher in the OAHT group at 3 days (P<0.01) and 7 days (P<0.05) than in the control group at the same timesThe OAHT group had a higher BAP at 3 ( P <0.01) and 7 days ( P <0.05) after OAHT than the control group at 3 and 7 days after starting collection of blood samples.
BAP within the OAHT group
Began to increase 2 days after OAHT; the value at 3 days was significantly higher than the pre, 1-day and 14-day values
Diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs)
No significant difference between the control and OAHT groups at any time point
Oxidative stress index (OSI)
Significantly lower in the OAHT group at 3 days (P<0.05) and 7 days (P<0.01) than in the control group at the same timesThe OAHT group had a significantly lower OSI at 3 ( P <0.05) and 7 days ( P <0.01) after OAHT than the control group at 3 and 7 days after starting collection of blood samples.
Duration of the antioxidant improvement
Observed until 7 days after treatment; no longer measurable at 14 days after treatment

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Safety as reported

No abnormal complete blood counts, biochemical tests or clinical signs were observed during the study period

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Follow-up

Blood sampled before OAHT and on 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days after OAHTWe collected blood samples before the OAHT (pre) and on 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days after the OAHT (post).

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Where we cite this study

All studies we track · How the studies compare