Ozone therapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in a patient with low back pain: A case report

Shamohammadi M, Mazraeh M, Tayebi A, Olamaeian F, et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 2025.

View the abstract on PubMed

Study type
Case report
People studied
1 person
Population
57-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease, treated with ozone therapy for L4-L5 lumbar disc herniation
Published
2025, International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
Identifiers
PMID 40233642, DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111289
Group
Safety and adverse events

What the authors reported

Ten minutes after her second ozone therapy session for lumbar disc herniation the patient developed abdominal pain and distension. X-rays and CT showed free air in the peritoneum and retroperitoneum without free fluid, and blood tests showed no notable abnormalities. She was treated without surgery in intensive care, discharged after five days, and was asymptomatic at one month.

What limits this result

Single case report. The authors state that the mechanism is undefined and suggest high-pressure ozone administration or improper instrument insertion. The route, site, ozone concentration, and volume of the session are not reported, and follow-up was one month.

Harms reported after ozone therapy, and studies of how ozone exposure affects health. One study rarely settles a medical question; our guides weigh each paper against the rest of the evidence.

How the study was done

Design
Case reportOzone therapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in a patient with low back pain: A case report
Setting
Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (author affiliation)
Read from
Read from the full text of the paper. Read on September 29, 2026.

Source: Abstract on PubMed

Study arms

Each group as the paper describes it.
GroupParticipantsWhat they received
Single patientNot reportedOzone therapy for lumbar disc herniation: a second session at another center, a month after the first

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Procedure as reported

Sessions
Two sessions, a month apart; the second at another centerA month after her first ozone therapy session, the patient underwent a second session at another center.

In the paper's own units, not converted.

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

What it measured

Symptom onset
Abdominal pain and distension ten minutes after the second sessionTen minutes following this procedure, she developed abdominal pain and distension.
Symptoms on admission
Nausea, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and chest pain
Chest and abdominal X-rays
Subdiaphragmatic, perirenal, and psoas free air
CT scan with IV contrast
Intra-abdominal and retro-abdominal scattered free air; no free fluid
Laboratory results
No clinically significant CBC abnormalities indicating infection or inflammation; no pancreatic or liver abnormalitiesThe Laboratory results did not demonstrate any clinically significant abnormalities in the CBC that would indicate an infectious or inflammatory condition, nor were there any pancreatic or liver abnormalities.
Management
Admitted to the intensive care unit for conservative treatmentInstantly, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and was approved for conservative treatment.
CT scan without contrast before discharge
Amount of free air in the abdomen considerably decreased
Discharge
Discharged in stable condition after five days of non-surgical and symptomatic treatment

Sources: Full text on PubMed Central, Abstract on PubMed

Safety as reported

Pneumoretroperitoneum and pneumoperitoneum, diagnosed as secondary to ozone therapy

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Follow-up

One month; asymptomatic, with no recurrence of previous symptoms

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Funding and conflicts

Did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Where we cite this study

All studies we track ยท How the studies compare