Medical Ozone as a Therapeutic Option in Musculoskeletal Pain Control: A Critical Review of Clinical Trials Considering Safety and Quality Indicators for Procedures and Devices

de Araújo LT, da Silva PC, Masini M. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 2024.

View the abstract on PubMed

Study type
Review
People studied
No participants of its own (review)
Population
27 clinical studies (pilot, randomized, and non-randomized trials) of medical ozone for musculoskeletal pain in adults, each with at least five participants
Published
2024, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
Identifiers
PMID 39351322, DOI 10.59249/HGTG9363
Group
Safety and adverse events

What the authors reported

From 249 records, 27 studies were included, most on low back pain. By the authors' grading, 77.8% of studies had no adverse events, 14.8% mild, 3.7% moderate, and 3.7% serious events, none involving death or disability. Ten studies did not name the ozone generator used. The authors conclude that medical ozone is safe and effective for musculoskeletal pain and call for longer, rigorous trials.

What limits this result

A critical review that grades quality indicators but uses no formal risk-of-bias tool. Case reports, case series, and studies with fewer than five participants were excluded, and only Portuguese, Spanish, and English papers were searched. The abstract gives the no-adverse-event share as "77 (8%)" and the text 77.8%. One author works for an ozone-generator maker that paid for the illustrations.

Harms reported after ozone therapy, and studies of how ozone exposure affects health. One study rarely settles a medical question; our guides weigh each paper against the rest of the evidence.

How the study was done

Design
Critical review of clinical trials, described in its methods as a scope reviewThis study is a scope review of clinical trials using complementary ozone therapy for pain control.
Setting
University of the State of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil (first author's affiliation); co-authors at Philozon, an ozone-generator company, and UNICEPLAC, Brasília
Read from
Read from the full text of the paper. Read on October 2, 2026.

Sources: Full text on PubMed Central, Abstract on PubMed

Study arms

Each group as the paper describes it.
GroupParticipantsWhat they received
Included clinical studies27Medical ozone for musculoskeletal pain, mostly by minimally invasive local injection; two studies used major autohemotherapy or intravenous routes

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

What it measured

Search and selection
27 studies included from 249 records
Conditions studied
Mostly low back pain, including lumbar disc herniation and lumbar degenerative disease
Ozone doses used
Concentrations or doses from 20 mcg to 40 mcg, which the authors call a moderate to high dose rangeWe noticed a wide variability of concentrations/doses ranging from 20 mcg to 40 mcg, which is considered a moderate to high dose range
Routes
Minimally invasive local injections, except two studies using major autohemotherapy and intravenous administration
Adverse events by severity (share of the 27 studies)
77.8% none, 14.8% mild, 3.7% moderate, 3.7% seriousFigure 6 shows the adverse events reported in the 27 reviewed studies, where according to intensity and severity, 77.8% had no adverse events; 14.8% were mild adverse events; 3.7% were considered moderate adverse events, and 3.7% serious adverse events.
Serious adverse events
None related to death or disability
Local and systemic adverse events
Local events in 18.5% of studies, systemic in 3.7%
Ozone generator reported
10 of the included studies did not name the generator used

Sources: Abstract on PubMed, Full text on PubMed Central

Safety as reported

Few adverse events in the 27 studies, mostly mild and then moderate; the authors consider the intervention safewe consider this intervention safe, which is confirmed by the report of few adverse events in the 27 clinical studies reviewed, most of which are classified as mild, followed by moderate adverse events.

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Funding and conflicts

The company where author PCS works (Philozon, an ozone-generator company) paid a computer technology professional to create the illustrations; the authors declared no source of funding

Source: Full text on PubMed Central

Where we cite this study

All studies we track · How the studies compare